No More Hiroshima and Slough Poem Comparision Essay Example for Free

No more Hiroshima and molt Poem Comparision testifyThere tin can be no doubt that gangrene and No More Hiroshimas constituent a large collection of differences. However, they additionally have similarities. The meter Slough written by antic Betjeman and is expressing his hatred for the place. This becomes apparent from the beginning when he ask for friendly bombs, come fall on slough. The sarcastic humour and juxtaposition of friendly and bomb are ironic and portray a dark two-baser of the place, and this is continued throughout the poem with words such as Death, and Hell. Moreover, the imagery of the poem is ferocious and ghastly which greats a sense of negativity towards Slough. The poem No More Hiroshimas by James Kirkup shares a similarity with Slough due to the aspect of war. No More Hiroshimas is constructed nearly the reconstruction of the city Hiroshimas after having nuclear bombs released on it. Furthermore, both poets are infuriated by the cities.No More Hir oshimas begins with the tourist arriving at the station, At the station exit, my bundle in overstep this already creates a sense of the poet coming off the train being confuse at how ready the station is and how he was expecting to gull huge inspirational memorials, however he was astonished and disappointed to see no memorials and compares it to any ordinary Japanese town.The poet in Slough wishes for slough to be obliterated as it says come bombs, and blow to smithereens whereas the No More Hiroshimas poem doesnt wish for the place to be wounded as the poet still sees Hiroshima as a precious place but it has just been used in the erroneous way due to commercialization of the demolished city. Consequently I believe this portrays a sense of negativity and is extremely idiosyncratic from the poet Betjeman and this continues throughout the whole poem. In the poem No More Hiroshimas the poet doesnt present any characters In a clear manner.Therefore he can talk about the place in a m ore general manner. Conversely in Slough the poet introduces characters as he feels he has to take his emotions out on the people not the city as it says for example and get that man with double chin, wholl always cheat and always win, who washes his repulsive skin In womens tears, the poet here is vehement that the people are additionally a cause for the failure of Slough whereas the in No More Hiroshimas there isnt blame on the people.