Reaction Paper on Hidden Heads of Household

Alma GuardadoProfessor TurkonOctober 11, 2018Reaction Paper on Hidden Heads of Ho procedurehold1.Within Brazil, worthless boorren argon found in situations that they cant escape due to extreme poverty and orbicularization and scour culture. Children be sometimes considered head of households, due to their p atomic number 18nts inability to contri thate sufficient in induce, hence, they would be pull upd to assist. Like for instance, when a mother cannot live due to pregnancy or staying home to take care of the infants, children would be presum adequate to work to replace their mother, I realized that it was the littlest one who was getting the to the highest degree gold.So, I let them go alone, until today. (Kenny, 1997, p.97) Due, to the low amount of employment available, families must move around frequently to available jobs, which most in all likelihood led them to overcrowded, violent favela nearby. Culture and politicians contri neverthelesse into the factor that po or children within these situations, since children hurt the mindset that they are unskilled and must work in dirty conditions and politics would lie that they would help on gas, groundless and water bills. However, they do not. They just wanted a vote. Children are forced upon their situation based on their family situation and poverty.2.In Brazil, globalization and economy are global makes that foster child labor. Child labor was influence due to the increase of wealth, since it brought upon an increase of poverty and inequality. A global shift in production expiryed into the issue of favelas, where more children were born into. In those horrible conditions they were forced to find a job at a young age to receive for in their plates every night.Also, due to the increase of capital investment in factories in Brazil where the labor is cheap, labor laws are not enforced brought upon more increase of children works there. Also, factory owners preferred children since they can pay them fewer wages. The increase of economy brought upon the swear of more workers to be able produce more goods.3.As the author emphasizes how she will give details, and the problematic study will result into good results, I honest expected more. I tangle it could be consider an development method, but not a study that led to good result. Yes, it did help numerous programs to be formed, yet exploitation does the same. It did not impact the whole situation in a large extent, it pushed positively, but it did not force individuals to stop and wonder what they could do to change the problem.It does a good job, emphasizing the suffering young children are faced and provokes us readers to feel sympathy and heartache knowing what is happening to them. However, does not give reasoned results, since the programs are not enforced they are created, yet not pushed forward into action. The author herself can use the situation for her benefit for her research. There was no real solution for h er study.4.Global tourism is one of the issues that affect the lives of galore(postnominal) children interdictly and positively based on the description given in the book. Some children will get to at 8 am at the tourist location, to beg for tourist for money, however, sometimes they frequently were alone offered food, but the kids wanted money due to the easier way to split money among each other and be able to buy what they want with it and hang on to some.Another, positive aspect of tourism was that they brought employment to manful children like guides, vendors and based on the satisfaction they might be able to gain extra money or food additionally from their fee for tours. But, for girls sometimes global tourism would be a negative aspect for them, since most of the time they could not have the same jobs as boys due to their physical appearance, hence, they would work in the sex industry.Sexual relationship with foreigners was in the hopes for young women, since it was a strategy for them to deal with poverty, and a desire for travel and material goods. Girls with low-esteem preferred foreigners to Brazilian men, since they thought they treated them better and believed in the hopes of opportunities would come around. In their perspective they believed they were happy since fifty-fifty if they lacked the formal education and financial safety net, they provided money to their family and felt some statues with their peers. The tourist industry brought exploitation of the poor children, however, at the same time brought hopes.5.The author refers to factor they mean a representative of the whole community or household on their behalf. Specifically, the agents the author refers to is the children, since they are truly the spokesperson telling their own reality of the harsh situations they are facing. In fact, the children should be agents in crafting policies that affect their situation, since it directly affects them.They are the ones who are facing po verty, low wages and harsh conditions and sometimes even the responsibility to have to put money on the table for their family. A fourteen-year-old child should not have the responsibility to work and not be able to receive an education, so why shouldnt they be able to craft the policies that are affecting their own lives. Its not the politicians nor the high-income class or even the adults who are universe directly affect, its the children.They are the ones who are on the job(p) and facing conditions that most individuals do not face at their age and no one really knows what goes on in their lives, since yes we can research about it, but it does not mean we face it every day like they do, so they should be ones who craft the definite policies rather than those viewing them as sweet little victims.6. Globalization isnt a tool to eliminate child labor in Brazil or elsewhere. It may be able to increase the employment and even the earnings to poor households in developing countries. But, the more desire for export products led to an increase of essential for labor, however, not towards adults. Within factories, they would prefer children since they could pay them less for their labor.Also, their shortness was desirable, since they could fit in small holes and beneath machines. (Kenny, 1997, p.7) Adults would be unemployed, or those in Brazil will work along with their children in the mills or textile factories. Altogether, globalization brought a negative effect, since when Brazil created a minor code to restrict children into working only six hours, parents did not like the idea which didnt led to the enforcement, nor was there an elimination of child labor.Also, the global shift increased the growth of urban favelas, which led poverty becoming deeper in Brazil and those who most likely work in factories would live in poverty, due to their low income. Globalization brings a desire for interaction of economy and prosperity, with no consideration of how child ren are treated. There is a more focus on the products than those creating the products.Kenny, M. L. (1997). Hidden heads of households Child labor in Northeast Brazil.